Method for standardizing input CMYK values for clustered printing environments

ABSTRACT

The present invention implements a CMYK to CMYK pre-transform in front of at least one printer to be clustered where the transform is designed to ensure that the printers addressed through the pre-transform have substantially identical output color for substantially identical input CMYK values. As one form of implementation a method is disclosed to build CMY to CMY 3D-LUTs and 1D-LUT for K using sensors in the field. Making use of a system LUT—CMY to CMY 3D-LUT and a K to K 1D-LUT—improves consistency and provides a coherent control strategy and a means to provide standardized input CMY and K values in a clustered environment so that single or multiple vendor DFEs see substantially identical CMYK values.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0001] The present invention generally relates to the field of standardization of input CMY and K values in a clustered environment and, more particularly, to standards which help Digital Front Ends (DFE) in a clustered environment relate CMY and K values to device independent L*a*b* values so a common set of CMYK values are presented to the DFE for multiple underlying print engines in the cluster.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] Closed loop controls have been disrupting one industry after another as they become replacements for expensive precision parts or wide windows of latitude product/process design. Generally, they have been expanding their scale from individual subsystems to IOTs to complete production-printing systems. The use of closed loop control technology instead of precision parts or robust open loop system modeling and design captures the Moore's law cost curves of the electronics industry for electromechanical products. Applying distributed controls outside the Input Output Terminals (IOT) for predictable color, rendering all suitably equipped color IOTs “identically” and being able to render printed color over display devices accurately opens color cluster printing as an option to large in line color printers (e.g., xerographic and offset) and distributed printing as a viable alternative to the print and distribute business model of high quality graphic arts.

[0003] One of the largest barriers to cluster color printing's applicability is the inconsistency in color output. The gray balance technology (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/566291, entitled: “On-line calibration system for a dynamically varying color marking device”) may still not be enough to achieve consistency in a distributed and clustered print environment.

[0004] The present invention is directed towards the elimination of such barriers by controlling the printers to have substantially identical output color responses for substantially identical input CMYK values.

BRIEF SUMMARY

[0005] The present invention implements a CMYK to CMYK pre-transform in front of at least one printer to be clustered where the transform is designed to ensure that the printers addressed through the pre-transform have substantially identical output color for substantially identical input CMYK values. As one form of implementation a method is disclosed to build CMY to CMY 3D-LUTs and 1D-LUT for K using sensors in the field. Making use of a system LUT-CMY to CMY 3D-LUT and a K to K 1D-LUT—improves consistency and provides a coherent control strategy and a means to provide standardized input CMY and K values in a clustered environment so that single or multiple vendor DFEs see substantially identical CMYK values.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0006] The preferred embodiments and other aspects of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when read in conjunction with the, accompanying drawings which are provided for the purpose of describing embodiments of the invention and not for limiting same, in which:

[0007]FIG. 1 illustrates use of system LUT [CMY to CMY 3D LUT and K to K 1D LUT] and sensor LUT [Lab to CMY 3D LUT, L* to K 1D LUT] as shown in the printer image path;

[0008]FIG. 2 illustrates use of system LUT [CMYK to CMYK 4D LUT] and sensor LUT [Spectrum to CMYK] as shown in the printer image path;

[0009]FIG. 3 shows a configuration for clustering print engines with controls shown by individual loops with two sensor on the output paper path with one in each print engine; and

[0010]FIG. 4 shows a configuration for clustering print engines with controls shown by individual loops with one sensor in a common paper path.

DETAILED SPECIFICATION

[0011] A method is disclosed to build CMY to CMY 3D-LUTs and 1D-LUT for K using sensors in the field. The present invention implements a CMYK to CMYK pre-transform in front of at least one printer to be clustered where the transform is designed to ensure that the printers addressed through the pre-transform have substantially identical output color for substantially identical input CMYK values. Making use of a system LUT-CMY to CMY 3D-LUT and a K to K 1D-LUT—in front of the gray balanced TRCs improves consistency and advantageously provides a coherent control strategy and a means to provide standardized input CMY and K values in a clustered environment so that single or multiple vendor DFEs see substantially identical CMYK values.

[0012] A CMYK to CMYK pre-transform is implemented in front of at least one printer to be clustered where the transform is designed to ensure that printers addressed through the pre-transform have substantially identical output color for substantially identical input CMYK values. Making use of a system LUT-CMYK to CMYK 4D-LUT—in front of the gray balanced TRCs improves consistency and advantageously provides a coherent control strategy and a means to provide input CMY and K values in a clustered environment so that single or multiple vendor DFEs see substantially identical CMYK values. As implemented in accordance with the techniques herein, the present invention help the DFEs in the clustered environment relate particular CMY and K values going into the printers to their device independent L*a*b* values. With this invention in place, DFE vendors can more easily construct 3D/4D profiles, such as ICC profiles, so as to perform color management functions more accurately.

[0013] With reference now being made to FIG. 1, pre-transforms are implemented as a system LUT (3D CMY to CMY transform and a 1D K to K LUT or a 4D CMYK to CMYK LUT) and a sensor LUT (Lab to CMY and L* to K 1D LUT or a Spectra to CMYK LUT/transform). In FIG. 1, the Digital Front End (DFE), at 10, provides input CMYK values to a system LUT, shown collectively at 12 and 14, wherein a CMY-to-CMY 3D transformation and a K-to-K transformation occurs. The system LUT providing thereby a set of transformed CMYK values, denoted as C′M′Y′ and K′, to block 16 wherein a Gray Balanced CMYK-to-CMYK TRCs process occurs providing modified CMYK values, denoted as C″M″Y″ and K″, to a Halftoner and Marking Module 18 wherein the pixels will be printed on the paper as in any xerographic printing system. The data generated therefrom is read by spectrophotometer 20 wherein the measured L*a*b* values, at 22, are provided to sensor LUT 24. Therein, L*a*b*-to-CMY and K-to-K transforms generate measured CMYK values, shown at 26. Module 28, takes the measured CMYK values generated by sensor LUT 34 and, using a set of CMY and K reference values, shown at 32 and 30 respectively, performs a CMY-to-CMY and K-to-K transform thereof to produce a set of Look-Up-Tables denoted CMY-to-CMY 3D LUT and K-to-K LUT. At 34, the CMY-to-CMY 3D LUTs and the K-to-K LUTs are used by a printer (not shown) to print a test target page. Printing of target can also be done by the DFE. Module 28 can reside in the DFE. The process is repeated, if required, with the CMYK values from module 28 being provided to modules 12 and 14 until the output colors of the printed test target page are acceptable.

[0014] With reference now being made to FIG. 2, the processing block is used to construct the system LUT. For this example, it is assumed that the final system LUT for CMY to CMY 3D LUT contain 10³ data points and for K to K LUT contain 256 data points. In FIG. 2, the Digital Front End (DFE), 36, provides input CMYK values to system LUT 38, wherein a CMYK-to-CMYK 4D transform produces modified CMYK values, denoted as C′M′Y′ and K′ to block 40 wherein a Gray Balanced CMYK-to-CMYK TRCs process occurs providing modified CMYK values, denoted as C″M″Y″ and K″, to Halftoner and Marking module 42. The data generated therefrom is read by spectrophotometer 44 wherein the measured Spectra values, at 46, are provided to sensor LUT 48. Therein, a Spectra-to-CMYK transform generates measured CMYK values, at 50. Module 52, takes the measured CMYK values generated by sensor LUT 48 and, using a set of CMY reference values, at 54, performs a CMYK-to-CMYK 4D transform to produce a set of Look-Up-Tables denoted as CMYK-to-CMYK 4D LUT. At 56, the CMYK-to-CMYK 4D LUTs are used by a printer (not shown) to print a test target page. The process is repeated, if required, with the CMYK values from module 52 being provided to system LUT 38 until the output colors of the printed test target page are acceptable.

[0015] In accordance with the present invention, construction of the system LUT involves the following steps which can be grouped into two groups; (1) one-time processing steps done at the factory, and (2) implementation of field updates.

[0016] A full 3D forward map of the gray balanced printer is first measured by printing test patches, which contain CMY patches with no black (i.e., K set to zero). The output CMY, (i.e., output of the sensor LUT; Lab to CMY LUT), from the sensor is obtained for these test patches. For this example 10³ patches have been selected. C, M and Y in the test page are varied between 0 to 100% in 10 steps.

[0017] Some K patches by setting C=M=Y=0 in the test target (preferably around 256 patches) are printed and their K values (output of sensor LUT when C=M=Y=0) measured.

[0018] Using interpolation routines commonly found in the arts, (trilinear/tetrahedral) up-sample this measured forward map. Up-sampling may not be required depending on how well the printer is linearized with internal process controls and the gray balance system.

[0019] A dynamic optimization technique known in the arts is applied to determine critical nodes. These optimal critical nodes will minimize the measurements required for real-time updates (updates in the field). Alternatively sequential linear interpolation techniques described in Sequential Linear Interpolation of Multi-Dimensional Functions, Allebach et al., IEEE Trans on Image Processing, Vol. 6. No. 9, September 1997), incorporated herein by reference be made thereto, can also be applied to determine critical nodes. In that example, 100 critical nodes were identified. The CMY values of these critical nodes become the input patch values for the test target to be used for field updates.

[0020] A dynamic optimization technique known in the arts is then applied to generate optimal nodes for creating 1D system LUT for K separation. This is the inverse map of the forward LUT using either an Iteratively Clustered Interpolation Technique, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/487,587, entitled: Iteratively clustered interpolation for geometrical interpolation of an irregularly spaced multidimensional color space”, by Yao WANG et al., or a Moving Matrix Algorithm, as described in: Refinement of printer transformations using weighted regression, R. Balasubramanian, Proc. SPIE, Vol 2658, pp. 334-340, (1996) both of which are incorporated herein by reference.

[0021] One way of updating the system LUT in the field is by printing and measuring test patches created at all nodes of the system LUT (e.g., uniformly sampled CMY & K values with 10³ nodes). In other words, the number of patches required are chosen equal to as many nodes as there are in the system LUT. Depending upon the particular system, these nodes could be many and may become tedious and time consuming to measure and control. Hence, a sub sampled node set is preferred.

[0022] A test target with CMYK values of the critical nodes (output CMYK in the critical node LUT) is created using compression algorithms known in the arts.

[0023] The sub-sampled CMYK test target (for critical patches) are printed and measured with the sensor and its LUT output (CMY values for CMY patches and K values for K patches).

[0024] The up-sampled version of the inverse map is built using trilinear/tetrahedral interpolation and the measured CMYK values for the sub-sampled CMYK test target. In the present instance, the up-sampled inverse map will have an approximate size of 10³. This will contain the desired system LUT (CMY to CMY 3D LUT and K to K 1D LUT). This can be referred to as post-processing. This post-processing is performed every time updates are required. One skilled in this art would appreciate the fact that if all nodes are measured and controlled then up-sampling is not required.

[0025] Since the system LUT may contain a finite number of nodes, for colors outside these nodes, transformation is preferably achieved by using an interpolator.

[0026] The sensor LUT is required to extract CMY and K values from the measured spectra/L*a*b* values of the color patches. It is built preferably using high resolution such as 25³ CMY patches and about 1000 K-patches to minimize interpolation errors. CMYK test patch target are first printed and their L*a*b* values on a chosen reference printer are measured. Trilinear or tetrahedral interpolation is used to construct a uniformly sampled input for sensor LUT. Uniform sampling is not required to make this work. The same sensor LUT can be used in all other printers in the cluster. This LUT is treated static in all the print engines as compared to system LUT and hence no further updates are required in the field. Whereas, to keep the colors consistent across host of printers and have the DFEs see substantially identical CMYK values for the clustered printers, the system LUT needs to be constantly updated using control steps shown above.

[0027]FIGS. 3 and 4 show configurations for clustering print engines with controls shown by individual loops with two sensor on the output paper path one in each print engine shown in FIG. 3, and with one sensor in a common paper path shown in FIG. 4.

[0028] With reference now being made to FIG. 3, a user wishes to print a color picture which is on their computing system 58 by sending it to a clustered print environment comprising two printing devices each having their own DFEs, at 60 and 74 respectively, and print engines, at 62 and 72 respectively. These two print devices share common finisher 66 with the print being thereafter directed to output 68. The colors comprising the picture intended to be printed are processed using common AIM-curves and provided to the DFEs of said at least one printer. The DFEs, 60 and 74 of FIG. 3, embody therein all the processing in either of FIGS. 1 and 2. In FIG. 3, the iterative processes, shown at 64 and 70, associated with each print engine corresponds to what is happening in either of FIGS. 1 or 2. As described in FIGS. 1 and 2, the gray-balanced TRCs and CMY-to-CMY and K-to-K LUTS adjust the color values comprising the colored pictured. These LUTS having been previously generated in accordance with the descriptions of either FIGS. 1 and 2. In either an online or off-line fashion, DFEs 60 and 74, iteratively adjust the colored picture, shown at 64 and 70 respectively. Alternatively, in either an online or off-line fashion, print engines 62 and 72, iteratively adjust the colored picture, shown at 64 and 70 respectively. The results therefrom being forwarded to common finisher 66 before being output at 68.

[0029] With reference now being made to FIG. 4, a user wishes to print a color picture which is on their computing system 58 by sending it to a clustered print environment comprising two printing devices sharing a common DFE 60 and having their own print engines, at 62 and 72 respectively. These print devices sharing paper merge module 78 and common finisher 66 with the print being thereafter directed to output 68. The colors comprising the picture intended to be printed are provided to DFE 60 embodying therein all the processing of either of FIGS. 1 and 2. In FIG. 4, the iterative processes, shown at 64 and 70, associated with each print engine corresponds to what is happening in either of FIGS. 1 or 2. As described in FIGS. 1 and 2, the gray-balanced TRCs and CMY-to-CMY and K-to-K LUTS adjust the color values comprising the colored pictured. These LUTS having been previously generated in accordance with the descriptions of either FIGS. 1 and 2. In either an online or off-line fashion, DFW In either an online or off-line fashion, DFEs 60 and 74, iteratively adjust the colored picture, at 64 and 70 respectively. Alternatively, in either an online or off-line fashion, print engines 62 and 72, iteratively adjust the colored picture, at 64 and 70 respectively. The results therefrom being forwarded to common finisher 66 before being output at 68.

[0030] By introducing the controls described above other core capabilities of the cluster printing (job splitting, load balancing, auto routing, job integrity etc.,) are not compromised. Dotted line between the controls loops in FIGS. 3 and 4 represent communication among printers.

[0031] Variations among the printers are compensated as control loop updates the system LUT. For instance a common variation seen among printers of the same family is variation in contrast due to different dynamic range of the printers (different Dmax/L*min). The sensors can measure the differences in dynamic range and the CMYK can be normalized to achieve a common dynamic range. Other differences in gamut may also be compensated for and incorporated in the CMYK to CMYK transform.

[0032] For an 8 bit system, a CMY to CMY 3D LUT would preferably use a 24-bit system whereas for a CMYK to CMYK 4D LUT would preferably use a 32-bit system. Generally, 17 Cube for 3D/4D LUTs are preferred. When reduced nodes are used in a look up table, a hardware or software interpolator based on trilinear/tetrahedral interpolation methods is preferable. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method to provide standardized input CMYK values to an environment of clustered printers, comprising: a) constructing a CMYK to CMYK system LUT; and b) positioning said system LUT in front of at least one printer in said cluster.
 2. A method, as in claim 1, wherein said sensor LUT generates CMYK values from spectrophotometer L*a*b* or reflectance spectra to construct the CMYK to CMYK system LUT.
 3. A method, as in claim 1, wherein the system LUT is designed to ensure that the printers addressed through the system LUT have substantially identical output color for substantially identical input CMYK values.
 4. A method, as in claim 1, wherein the system LUT is constructed using at least one processing algorithm and at least one sensor LUT.
 5. A method, as in claim 1, wherein the system LUT comprises a 3D CMY to CMY LUT and a 1D K to K LUT.
 6. A method, as in claim 2, wherein the system LUT comprises a 4D CMYK to CMYK LUT.
 7. A method, as in claim 2, wherein the sensor LUT comprises a L*a*b* to CMY LUT and L* to K 1D LUT.
 8. A method, as in claim 2, wherein the sensor LUT comprises a Spectra to CMYK LUT.
 9. A method, as in claim 3, wherein the creation of the system LUT comprises: a) measuring a full 3D forward map of the printer by printing test patches which contain CMY patches with no black, (i.e., K set to zero); b) measuring the output CMY, (i.e., output of a sensor LUT), from the sensor LUT for these test patches; and c) printing K patches by setting C=M=Y=0 in the printed test patches and measuring their K values, (output of the sensor LUT).
 10. A method, as in claim 9, further comprising applying optimization to generate optimal test patches for creating said system LUT.
 11. A method, as in claim 9, further comprising up-sampling the measured forward map using interpolation.
 12. A method, as in claim 3, wherein the creation of the system LUT comprises: a) measuring a full 4D forward map of the printer by printing test patches which contain CMYK patches; and b) measuring the output CMYK, (i.e., output of a sensor LUT), from the sensor for these test patches.
 13. A method, as in claim 12, further comprising applying optimization to generate optimal test patches for creating said system LUT.
 14. A method, as in claim 12, further comprising up-sampling the measured forward map using interpolation.
 15. A method, as in claim 9, further comprising constructing an inverse map using measured CMYK values for the CMYK test patches.
 16. A method, as in claim 12, further comprising constructing an inverse map using measured CMYK values for the CMYK test patches.
 17. A method, as in claim 1, wherein the sensor LUT required to extract CMYK values from the measured spectra/L*a*b* values of the test patches is built using high resolution CMYK patches, comprises printing CMYK test patches and measuring their spectra/L*a*b* values on a reference printer.
 18. A method, as in claim 18, further comprising using interpolation to construct a uniformly sampled input for the sensor LUT.
 19. A method, as in claim 18, further comprising using modeling to construct a uniformly sampled input for the sensor LUT.
 20. A method, as in claim 1, further comprising updating the system LUT to keep output colors consistent across host of printers.
 21. A method to standardize input CMYK values in an environment of clustered printers so that the printers produce substantially identical output color for substantially identical input CMYK values, comprising: a) constructing a CMYK to CMYK system LUT; b) positioning said system LUT in front of at least one printer in said cluster; and c) addressing at least one of said printers through said system LUT.
 22. A method, as in claim 21, said system LUT comprising CMYK values generated from spectra/L*a*b* values from a sensor LUT.
 23. A method, as in claim 21, said system LUT comprising at least one processing algorithm and at least one sensor LUT.
 24. A method, as in claim 21, said system LUT comprising at least one 3-Dimensional CMY to CMY LUT and at least one 1-Dimensional K to K LUT.
 25. A method, as in claim 22, said system LUT further comprising at least one 4-Dimensional CMYK to CMYK LUT.
 26. A method, as in claim 22, said sensor LUT comprising at least one L*a*b* to CMY LUT and at least one L* to K 1-Dimensional LUT.
 27. A method, as in claim 22, said sensor LUT comprising at least one Spectra to CMYK LUT.
 28. A method, as in claim 21, further comprising printing at least one CMYK test patch on a reference printer and measuring spectra/L*a*b* values therefrom.
 29. A method, as in claim 28, further comprising using interpolation to construct a uniformly sampled input for said sensor LUT.
 30. A method, as in claim 28, further comprising using modeling to construct a uniformly sampled input for said sensor LUT.
 31. A method, as in claim 21, the constructing of said system LUT comprising: a) measuring a 3-Dimensional forward map of at least one printer by printing at least one test patch containing color patches with no black; b) measuring output CMY values from a sensor LUT for said test patch; c) setting C=M=Y=0 in said test patch; d) printing at least one K patch; and e) measuring K values from the output of said sensor LUT.
 32. A method, as in claim 31, said system LUT further comprising constructing an inverse map using measured CMYK values for test patches.
 33. A method, as in claim 31, said system LUT further comprising applying optimization to generate at least one optimal test patch.
 34. A method, as in claim 31, said system LUT further comprising up-sampling the measured forward map using interpolation.
 35. A method, as in claim 21, the constructing of said system LUT comprising: a) measuring a 4-Dimensional forward map of at least one printer by printing at least one test patch containing CMYK patches; b) measuring output CMYK values from a sensor LUT for said test patch; c) setting C=M=Y=0 in said test patch; d) printing at least one K patch; and e) measuring K values from the output of said sensor LUT.
 36. A method, as in claim 35, said system LUT further comprising applying optimization to generate at least one optimal test patch.
 37. A method, as in claim 35, said system LUT further comprising up-sampling the measured forward map using interpolation.
 38. A method, as in claim 35, said system LUT further comprising constructing an inverse map using measured CMYK values for the test patches.
 39. A method, as in claim 21, further comprising printing at least one CMYK test patch on a reference printer and measuring spectra/L*a*b* values therefrom.
 40. A method, as in claim 39, further comprising using interpolation or modeling to construct a uniformly sampled input for said sensor LUT.
 41. A print system, having a clustered configuration of printers with a common paper path, and providing standardized input CMYK values so said at least one printer produces substantially identical output colors for substantially identical input CMYK values, comprising: a) a common sensor with at least one sensor LUT; b) a CMYK to CMYK system LUT in front of at least one printer in said cluster; and c) a controller module for addressing at least one printer through said system LUT.
 42. A system, as in claim 41, wherein said system LUT comprises CMYK values generated from spectra/L*a*b* values from a sensor LUT.
 43. A system, as in claim 41, wherein said system LUT comprises at least one processing algorithm and at least one sensor LUT.
 44. A system, as in claim 41, wherein said system LUT comprises at least one 3-Dimensional CMY to CMY LUT and at least one 1-Dimensional K to K LUT.
 45. A system, as in claim 42, said system LUT further comprises at least one 4-Dimensional CMYK to CMYK LUT.
 46. A system, as in claim 42, said sensor LUT comprises at least one L*a*b* to CMY LUT and at least one L* to K 1-Dimensional LUT.
 47. A system, as in claim 42, said sensor LUT comprises at least one Spectra to CMYK LUT.
 48. A system, as in claim 41, further comprising printing at least one CMYK test patch on a reference printer and measuring spectra/L*a*b* values therefrom.
 49. A system, as in claim 48, further comprising using interpolation to construct a uniformly sampled input for said sensor LUT.
 50. A system, as in claim 48, further comprising using modeling to construct a uniformly sampled input for said sensor LUT.
 51. A system, as in claim 41, wherein the constructing of said system LUT comprises: a) measuring a 3-Dimensional forward map of at least one printer by printing at least one test patch containing color patches with no black; b) measuring output CMY values from a sensor LUT for said test patch; c) setting C=M=Y=0 in said test patch; d) printing at least one K patch; and e) measuring K values from the output of said sensor LUT.
 52. A system, as in claim 51, the constructing of said system LUT further comprising constructing an inverse map using measured CMYK values for test patches.
 53. A system, as in claim 51, the constructing of said system LUT further comprising applying optimization to generate at least one optimal test patch.
 54. A system, as in claim 51, the constructing of said system LUT further comprising up-sampling the measured forward map using interpolation.
 55. A system, as in claim 41, the constructing of said system LUT further comprising: a) measuring a 4-Dimensional forward map of at least one printer by printing at least one test patch containing CMYK patches; b) measuring output CMYK values from a sensor LUT for said test patch; c) setting C=M=Y=0 in said test patch; d) printing at least one K patch; and e) measuring K values from the output of said sensor LUT.
 56. A system, as in claim 55, the constructing of said system LUT further comprising applying optimization to generate at least one optimal test patch.
 57. A system, as in claim 55, the constructing of said system LUT further comprising up-sampling the measured forward map using interpolation.
 58. A system, as in claim 55, the constructing of said system LUT further comprising constructing an inverse map using measured CMYK values for the test patches.
 59. A system, as in claim 41, further comprising printing at least one CMYK test patch on a reference printer and measuring spectra/L*a*b* values therefrom.
 60. A system, as in claim 59, further comprising using interpolation or modeling to construct a uniformly sampled input for said sensor LUT.
 61. A print system having a clustered configuration and a common finisher for providing standardized input CMYK values, and comprising: a) a plurality of sensors, with at least one sensor LUT, in individual paper paths of each clustered printer; b) a CMYK to CMYK system LUT in front of at least one printer in said cluster; and c) a controller module for addressing said at least one printer through said system LUT such that said at least one printer produces substantially identical output colors for substantially identical input CMYK values.
 62. A system, as in claim 61, wherein said system LUT comprises CMYK values generated from spectra/L*a*b* values from a sensor LUT.
 63. A system, as in claim 61, wherein said system LUT comprises at least one processing algorithm and at least one sensor LUT.
 64. A system, as in claim 61, wherein said system LUT comprises at least one 3-Dimensional CMY to CMY LUT and at least one 1-Dimensional K to K LUT.
 65. A system, as in claim 62, said system LUT further comprises at least one 4-Dimensional CMYK to CMYK LUT.
 66. A system, as in claim 62, said sensor LUT comprises at least one L*a*b* to CMY LUT and at least one L* to K 1-Dimensional LUT.
 67. A system, as in claim 62, said sensor LUT comprises at least one Spectra to CMYK LUT.
 68. A system, as in claim 61, further comprising printing at least one CMYK test patch on a reference printer and measuring spectra/L*a*b* values therefrom.
 69. A system, as in claim 68, further comprising using interpolation to construct a uniformly sampled input for said sensor LUT.
 70. A system, as in claim 68, further comprising using modeling to construct a uniformly sampled input for said sensor LUT.
 71. A system, as in claim 61, wherein the constructing of said system LUT comprises: a) measuring a 3-Dimensional forward map of at least one printer by printing at least one test patch containing color patches with no black; b) measuring output CMY values from a sensor LUT for said test patch; c) setting C=M=Y=0 in said test patch; d) printing at least one K patch; and e) measuring K values from the output of said sensor LUT.
 72. A system, as in claim 71, the constructing of said system LUT further comprising constructing an inverse map using measured CMYK values for test patches.
 73. A system, as in claim 71, the constructing of said system LUT further comprising applying optimization to generate at least one optimal test patch.
 74. A system, as in claim 71, the constructing of said system LUT further comprising up-sampling the measured forward map using interpolation.
 75. A system, as in claim 61, the constructing of said system LUT further comprising: a) measuring a 4-Dimensional forward map of at least one printer by printing at least one test patch containing CMYK patches; b) measuring output CMYK values from a sensor LUT for said test patch; c) setting C=M=Y=0 in said test patch; d) printing at least one K patch; and e) measuring K values from the output of said sensor LUT.
 76. A system, as in claim 75, the constructing of said system LUT further comprising applying optimization to generate at least one optimal test patch.
 77. A system, as in claim 75, the constructing of said system LUT further comprising up-sampling the measured forward map using interpolation.
 78. A system, as in claim 75, the constructing of said system LUT further comprising constructing an inverse map using measured CMYK values for the test patches.
 79. A system, as in claim 61, further comprising printing at least one CMYK test patch on a reference printer and measuring spectra/L*a*b* values therefrom.
 80. A system, as in claim 79, further comprising using interpolation or modeling to construct a uniformly sampled input for said sensor LUT. 